On the package it says you get approximately 23 pieces or 37 grams for 130 calories, no fat and 3g of fibre. Yeah that's 2 points!!
However before i counted out 23 i stopped and thought no i'm going to weigh them :) And this is how many i got for 37 grams. A total rip off!!
13 comments:
I swear they look like hunks of meat lol. Sorry you didn't get as many as you were suppose to. It almost looks like they screwed up on the package with a whole 10 to short.
That doesn't look like much at all. Were they good though?
Oh, that's disappointing!
They look like sausage bites.
Just send them to me. I'll eat em..
I thought "why is she posting a pic of beef jerky bites after talking about fruit?" LOL That is definitely a rip off! 10 short...geez. That makes me wonder how off a lot of "nutritional content/info" is....
They do look like little sausages! Mega-processed food sure is funny looking! But supposedly that's a huge problem, serving sizes being misrepresented, though it seems particularly egregious in this case.
Oh wow, what a rip!
Smart of you to weigh them though. I would have just taken the "approx pieces" word for it.
I'd be tempted to write to them.
That's why I always weigh stuff out! It's never the same as the package says!
Bummer! The package is so misleading!
I hoped they tasted better then they look!
I get so mad when companies do this-I ate this frozen cheesecake from walmart (about the size of a yogurt) and it said 60 calories(that's the only reason why I bought it)as I was eating it, thinking wow this is good it says there was 6 serving in one containter = 360 calories for one darn yogurt sized -rotton people
You should totally write to the company and complain. You may be able to get your money back. I had the same problem with serving size from a product I got at Trader Joes. I brought the wrapper back into them and they gave me a refund no problem!
Can you email them and call them on it? That's a big difference!
Post a Comment